There are few examples of maps being changed except in the aftermath of war

lipulekh

lipulekh

A new map of Nepal has been made public. Lands like Lipulec, which have been under Indian rule for about six decades, are now shown to belong to Nepal even though they are on the map. If India recognizes our west-north beak, which seems to be aimed at Delhi (of the new map), then naturally India will have to change its map as well.

For Indian Prime Minister Modi and all Indians, it will be like turning the Ram Janma Bhoomi of Ayodhya back into a Bawri Masjid. Here Oli, KP Oli ji and now all Nepalis will not be able to back away from  this issue easily. Now both Oli and Deuba are riding in a tiger.

A bipartisan technical committee has been working for years to resolve the border issue between Nepal and India. After Nepal issued such a new map, the bipartisan committee was no longer justified. Probably a factor as to why they're doing so poorly. Nepal's objection is not only in Lipulek area, but also in Susta, Saptari and Pashupati. According to this, you may have to change the map again and again. Lipulek-Kalapani should not be of more importance and no importance elsewhere. The same rift of sovereignty is attached to all.

How are the relations between India and Nepal going now? Putting this question aside, it will not be easy to move forward with other bilateral economic and diplomatic issues. Its benefits and audits must have been done.

There was an awkward task of changing the map. In South Asian countries, only Jinnah, Sheikh Mujib and Indira Gandhi have changed, reduced or increased the map of their country. There are many examples of leaders changing the country's national days. However, there are few examples of maps being changed except in the aftermath of a war.